| |
Advantages
of EnviroDrive
Systems
Following are the advantages
of installing EnviroDrive
systems:
-
EnviroDrive
systems do not emit Greenhouse
Gases (GHG)
- EnviroDrive
systems can operate in sweet
or sour gas field at remote
locations as they operate
on differential pressure
and do not rely on an outside
source of energy
- EnviroDrive
systems stop and do not
waste methanol if a well
shuts down.
- EnviroDrive
systems stop if a well shuts
down, which eliminates the
possibility of chemical
blasts down line.
- EnviroDrive
systems function quietly.
- EnviroDrive
systems eliminate the need
for flare stacks resulting
in no incomplete combustion,
potential fire hazard or
releases of CO2,
NOx and SOx.
- EnviroDrive
systems allow the gas used
for propulsion to re-enter
the gas line so that there
is no loss of salable gas.
EnviroDrive
systems not only eliminate
emissions, but also provide
a substantial production cost
savings for the resource producer.
Propane, when used as the
propellant has risen 29.2%
over the past six years. Based
on the Table 14-U.S. Propane
(Consumer Grade) prices by
Sales Typei for
industrial consumers, propane
has risen from 65.2 cents
per gallon in 1994 to 95.7
cents per gallon in February
2000; an increase of 30.5
cents per gallon. An EnviroDrive
System eliminates both this
cost as it is propelled by
the resource itself and does
not exhaust to atmosphere
but directs the resource back
into the production stream
as sales gas.
The emissions from both flared
and vented gases is staggering.
Solution gas flares account
for approximately 71% of all
gas flared and vented in Alberta.ii
Emissions from flared and
vented gases are a major health
and environmental problem.
Agencies such as the Natural
Resources Defense Council
of the United States have placed
in legislation new laws as
part of the Clean Air Act
enabling concerned groups
to use courts, the bargaining
table and even the marketplace
to clean up our air and our
water. A Report to Environment
Canada Conservation and Protection,
the Alberta Energy and Utilities
Board and the Canadian Association
of Petroleum Producers prepared
by M. Strosher, Environmental
Technologies Alberta Research
Council, Calgary, Alberta,
November 1996 evaluated emissions
and offers proof of the severity
of the emissions problem. Statistics
Canada has available charts
of Carbon Dioxide emissions
from fossil fuel combustion,
per capita and per dollar
real GDP to substantiate the
loss of both revenue and clean
air.
|
|